Tweet

In a bold and controversial move that has sparked outrage across St. Kitts and Nevis, Prime Minister Dr. Hon. Terrance Drew’s administration is being accused of using the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) as a tool to suppress opposition voices and muzzle citizens’ rights to free speech. Critics argue that this is part of a broader effort to control public discourse, particularly on social and traditional media platforms, which have become a powerful vehicle for dissent and critique of government actions.

DPP’s Unprecedented Stance Draws Criticism

The DPP’s recent fervent warnings against public discussions on certain high-profile cases have left many questioning his priorities. One observer did not mince words:

*”Wait there! I’ve never heard the DPP threaten any criminals, but here he is, quick to threaten regular citizens if we talk about a public case, which, by the way, the Constitution of St. Kitts and Nevis gives us the right to do. I beg you, please, don’t say anything about the good comrade’s daughter. At least the National Security Advisor has the courage to address criminals directly, even telling them that if they don’t borrow money and leave the island, it will cause problems for us. But Mr. DPP, you? Please go sit down somewhere, because I’ve never heard anything from you before now.

And honestly, I pray to God I never have a case where you are my DPP, because whatever they taught you in law school, garbee, you seem to have forgotten! All of a sudden, you’re coming down hard on regular people who are simply talking, as we always do. But when it comes to addressing the big crimes happening in the country? Silence! You cannot pick and choose when to act tough based on who is involved. Mr. DPP, get yourself together and stop displaying such blatant double standards and bias. The people deserve better!”*

Where’s the Same Energy for Serious Crimes?

The criticism of the DPP comes amidst public frustration over a series of unsolved high-profile cases, including:

• The murder of dancehall artiste I Mark
• The assassination of PLP community leader Azziwah “Milk” Niles
• The vehicular homicide involving Dr. Simoneth Williams

None of these cases have resulted in arrests or significant updates, leaving citizens to question the DPP’s priorities. The silence from law enforcement and the DPP’s office on these matters has only fueled accusations of double standards and selective justice.

Freedom of Speech Under Threat

As public outrage grows, many are pointing to the Constitution of St. Kitts and Nevis, which guarantees fundamental rights, including freedom of speech and expression. The Constitution, adopted in 1983, explicitly protects these rights along with freedom of assembly, association, and the press.

However, there have been increasing concerns that the current administration is encroaching on these freedoms. Observers have noted that previous governments have been criticized for limiting media access to opposition parties, and this latest episode suggests a troubling continuation of that trend.

Opposition Voices Speak Out

The opposition and civil society leaders are calling on citizens to resist any attempt to suppress their voices. “We as a people must not allow anyone—whether it is the DPP, AG, or PM—to stifle our right to free expression and freedom of speech,” said one vocal critic.

The actions of the DPP have cast a shadow over the administration’s commitment to democratic principles, with many questioning whether these moves are designed to intimidate dissenting voices and protect certain individuals from scrutiny.

A Turning Point for Democracy?

The controversy has reignited debates over the balance of power in St. Kitts and Nevis and the need for stronger safeguards to protect citizens’ rights. The government’s critics are calling for immediate transparency and accountability to rebuild public trust and ensure that justice is applied equally, regardless of political affiliations or social status.

As the nation watches closely, one thing is clear: the citizens of St. Kitts and Nevis will not remain silent in the face of what they perceive as an attack on their constitutional freedoms.